On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Martin Peres
wrote:
> On 10/08/15 15:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:37:24PM +0300, Martin Peres wrote:
>>>
>>> 10-12 are:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres
>>
>> One thing to consider, do we want to do a s/typedef/struct brw_batch/
>> cle
On 10/08/15 15:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:37:24PM +0300, Martin Peres wrote:
10-12 are:
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres
One thing to consider, do we want to do a s/typedef/struct brw_batch/
cleanup after the transition is complete?
brw_batch vs struct brw_batch ?
brw_bo vs
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:37:24PM +0300, Martin Peres wrote:
> 10-12 are:
>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres
One thing to consider, do we want to do a s/typedef/struct brw_batch/
cleanup after the transition is complete?
brw_batch vs struct brw_batch ?
brw_bo vs struct brw_bo ?
-Chris
--
Chris Wi
10-12 are:
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres
On 07/08/15 23:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
In order to reduce future churn, rename the intel_batchbuffer struct.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_batch.h | 4 ++--
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 2 +-
In order to reduce future churn, rename the intel_batchbuffer struct.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_batch.h | 4 ++--
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 2 +-
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c | 6 ++
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/
