On Thu 16 Jun 2016, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Chad Versace
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat 11 Jun 2016, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > They're already zero-initialized and we have no plans of doing anything
> > > more interesting with them.
> > > ---
> > > src/intel/isl/isl_su
On Thu 16 Jun 2016, Chad Versace wrote:
> On Sat 11 Jun 2016, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > They're already zero-initialized and we have no plans of doing anything
> > more interesting with them.
> > ---
> > src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 9 -
> > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
>
>
>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Chad Versace
wrote:
> On Sat 11 Jun 2016, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > They're already zero-initialized and we have no plans of doing anything
> > more interesting with them.
> > ---
> > src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 9 -
> > 1 file changed, 9 deletio
On Sat 11 Jun 2016, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> They're already zero-initialized and we have no plans of doing anything
> more interesting with them.
> ---
> src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 9 -
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> @@ -261,12 +258,6 @@ isl_genX(surf_fill_state_s)(const st
They're already zero-initialized and we have no plans of doing anything
more interesting with them.
---
src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c
b/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c
index ae8096f..c36ef3b 100644
