On 24/02/17 21:54, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
> mailto:sigles...@igalia.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24/02/17 02:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Each of the pop functions (and push_else) take a control flow
> parameter as
> > the
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <
sigles...@igalia.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24/02/17 02:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Each of the pop functions (and push_else) take a control flow parameter
> as
> > their second argument. If NULL, it assumes that the builder is in a
> block
On 24/02/17 02:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Each of the pop functions (and push_else) take a control flow parameter as
> their second argument. If NULL, it assumes that the builder is in a block
> that's a direct child of the control-flow node you want to pop off the
> virtual stack. This is wha
Each of the pop functions (and push_else) take a control flow parameter as
their second argument. If NULL, it assumes that the builder is in a block
that's a direct child of the control-flow node you want to pop off the
virtual stack. This is what 90% of consumers will want. The SPIR-V pass,
how
