On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Matt Turner writes:
>>
>>> To make it match unop().
>>
>> FWIW, this series plus the algebraic patch appears to net the same code
>> generated on vc4, so I'm fine with it. Based on the oth
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Matt Turner writes:
>
>> To make it match unop().
>
> FWIW, this series plus the algebraic patch appears to net the same code
> generated on vc4, so I'm fine with it. Based on the other feedback, it
> does seem like we should leave the GLSL op
Matt Turner writes:
> To make it match unop().
FWIW, this series plus the algebraic patch appears to net the same code
generated on vc4, so I'm fine with it. Based on the other feedback, it
does seem like we should leave the GLSL ops for now and just change the
NIR to be simpler.
signature.as
The series is
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick
Patch 1 could probably land right away, but the others should probably
wait until Ilia relaxes his objection.
I'd really like to have Ken or Jason also review patch 6.
On 11/30/2015 03:32 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> To make it match unop().
> ---
> src/gls
To make it match unop().
---
src/glsl/builtin_functions.cpp | 35 ++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glsl/builtin_functions.cpp b/src/glsl/builtin_functions.cpp
index c5489b7..88f9a71 100644
--- a/src/glsl/builtin_functions.cpp
+
