On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Saturday, September 05, 2015 11:10:58 AM Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Kenneth Graunke
>> wrote:
>> > On Friday, September 04, 2015 11:56:29 AM Connor Abbott wrote:
>> >> I'm confused as to how this can happen.
On Saturday, September 05, 2015 11:10:58 AM Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On Friday, September 04, 2015 11:56:29 AM Connor Abbott wrote:
> >> I'm confused as to how this can happen. The fake link is only for the
> >> situation where we have an in
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Friday, September 04, 2015 11:56:29 AM Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Kenneth Graunke
>> wrote:
>> > Prevents regressions in ~128 tests when fixing unlink_block_successors
>> > in the next commit.
>> >
>> > XXX:
On Friday, September 04, 2015 11:56:29 AM Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > Prevents regressions in ~128 tests when fixing unlink_block_successors
> > in the next commit.
> >
> > XXX: Zero thought has been put into whether this is the right solution
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Prevents regressions in ~128 tests when fixing unlink_block_successors
> in the next commit.
>
> XXX: Zero thought has been put into whether this is the right solution
I'm confused as to how this can happen. The fake link is only for the
si
Prevents regressions in ~128 tests when fixing unlink_block_successors
in the next commit.
XXX: Zero thought has been put into whether this is the right solution
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke
---
src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The
