On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> This is different from how we do it in the FS - we are using MAD even when
> some of the args are constants, because with the relatively unrestrained
> ability to schedule a MOV to prepare a temporary with that data, we can
> get lower latency f
This is different from how we do it in the FS - we are using MAD even when
some of the args are constants, because with the relatively unrestrained
ability to schedule a MOV to prepare a temporary with that data, we can
get lower latency for the sequence of instructions.
No significant performance
