From: Roland Scheidegger
There's two reasons for this:
1) even when ignoring rho approximation for cube maps, the result is still
not correct, but it's better as the max error at edges is now sqrt(2) instead
of 2 (which was a full mip level), same as it is for ordinary 2d maps when
doing rho appr
On 10/03/2013 09:42 AM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
There's two reasons for this:
1) even when ignoring rho approximation for cube maps, the result is still
not correct, but it's better as the max error at edges is now sqrt(2) instead
of 2 (which was a full mip level), sa
From: Roland Scheidegger
There's two reasons for this:
1) even when ignoring rho approximation for cube maps, the result is still
not correct, but it's better as the max error at edges is now sqrt(2) instead
of 2 (which was a full mip level), same as it is for ordinary 2d maps when
doing rho appr
