On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:54:43 -0800
Keith Packard wrote:
> Lauri Kasanen writes:
>
> > Forgot to mention, this would appear to make 3d impossible without udev
> > (ie, static devices, mdev, or other solutions).
>
> No, DRI2 continues to fall back to using the driver provided by the X
> server i
Lauri Kasanen writes:
> Forgot to mention, this would appear to make 3d impossible without udev
> (ie, static devices, mdev, or other solutions).
No, DRI2 continues to fall back to using the driver provided by the X
server if it can't find one locally.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgppIx3XzY_4
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:16:05 +0200
Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:46:21 -0800
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > The loader infrastructure for everything but DRI2 requires that udev be
> > present, so we can figure out an appropriate driver from the fd. We don't
> > have a portable solu
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:46:21 -0800
Eric Anholt wrote:
> The loader infrastructure for everything but DRI2 requires that udev be
> present, so we can figure out an appropriate driver from the fd. We don't
> have a portable solution yet, but presumably it will similar lookup based
> on the device
The loader infrastructure for everything but DRI2 requires that udev be
present, so we can figure out an appropriate driver from the fd. We don't
have a portable solution yet, but presumably it will similar lookup based
on the device node.
It will also be even more required for krh's udev-based h
