On 22.04.2016 17:19, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>
>> (Curiously, there is an old "this is probably not needed anymore" comment on
>> the PS_PARTIAL_FLUSH in si_context_gfx_flush, but this may be wrong: since
>> shaders can write memory, and the ker
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 21.04.2016 13:51, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> We can use shaders from multiple contexts, and they were not
>> otherwise locked yet.
>
>
> Ouch... I guess this is why compute scratch buffers used to be per-program?
>
> I'm still trying
On 21.04.2016 13:51, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
We can use shaders from multiple contexts, and they were not
otherwise locked yet.
Ouch... I guess this is why compute scratch buffers used to be per-program?
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the possible code paths here...
are you sure tha
We can use shaders from multiple contexts, and they were not
otherwise locked yet.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_compute.c | 20
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+),
