On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> CID 1362171, 1362170
>
> Looks like it should be pipe_transfer_usage in the prototype, based on
> how the parameter is used. Note that I don't see any users of u_staging
> so maybe we should just remove it?
Yes, that would
From: Rob Clark
CID 1362171, 1362170
Looks like it should be pipe_transfer_usage in the prototype, based on
how the parameter is used. Note that I don't see any users of u_staging
so maybe we should just remove it?
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_staging.c | 2 +-
s
