On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> If we want to use NIR from state trackers that don't already pull in the
>> whole of glsl (ie. anything other than mesa state tracker), we need a
>> separate more min
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> If we want to use NIR from state trackers that don't already pull in the
> whole of glsl (ie. anything other than mesa state tracker), we need a
> separate more minimal libnir. Possibly NIR should be better split out
> from g
From: Rob Clark
If we want to use NIR from state trackers that don't already pull in the
whole of glsl (ie. anything other than mesa state tracker), we need a
separate more minimal libnir. Possibly NIR should be better split out
from glsl, but for now, generate a second smaller libnir.la for tho
