Yup, most definitely. I just have one more thing to test before
sending out a V2. I've toyed around with arrays and sets and
stuff to see if there are better options than a linked list.
At least for now the answer is: "no, there isn't", but I'm gonna
test u_vector for this use later today to see if
Hello Thomas,
is this useful even after '[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/2] V2: Use hash table
cloning in copy propagation' landed?
I've running both together with Dave's '[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radv/winsys:
replace bo list searchs with a hash table.' patch.
Dieter
Am 24.01.2018 08:33, schrieb Thomas Hell
2018-01-21 23:58 GMT+01:00 Eric Anholt :
> Thomas Helland writes:
>
>> Also, allocate worklist_elem in groups of 20, to reduce the burden of
>> allocation. Do not use rzalloc, as there is no need. This lets us drop
>> the number of calls to ralloc from aproximately 10% of all calls to
>> ralloc(13
Thomas Helland writes:
> Also, allocate worklist_elem in groups of 20, to reduce the burden of
> allocation. Do not use rzalloc, as there is no need. This lets us drop
> the number of calls to ralloc from aproximately 10% of all calls to
> ralloc(130 000 calls), down to a mere 2000 calls to ra
Hello to all of you and a
Happy New Year! ;-)
Any thoughts about this, Marek, Nicolai?
I'm running this for four weeks without any hickup, now.
Thanks,
Dieter
Am 06.12.2017 09:56, schrieb Dieter Nützel:
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel
Dieter
Am 02.12.2017 15:49, schrieb Thomas Helland:
Also, all
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel
Dieter
Am 02.12.2017 15:49, schrieb Thomas Helland:
Also, allocate worklist_elem in groups of 20, to reduce the burden of
allocation. Do not use rzalloc, as there is no need. This lets us drop
the number of calls to ralloc from aproximately 10% of all calls to
ralloc(1
Also, allocate worklist_elem in groups of 20, to reduce the burden of
allocation. Do not use rzalloc, as there is no need. This lets us drop
the number of calls to ralloc from aproximately 10% of all calls to
ralloc(130 000 calls), down to a mere 2000 calls to ralloc_array_size.
This cuts the r