On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:33:00 -0700, "Ian Romanick" wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> The code previously passed GL_DYNAMIC_DRAW for the access parameter.
> By inspection, I believe that all drivers would treat this as
> GL_READ_WRITE because it's not GL_READ_ONLY and it's not
> GL_WRITE_ONLY. How
Your analysis sounds reasonable to me, Ian. Looks good.
Keith
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 00:33 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> The code previously passed GL_DYNAMIC_DRAW for the access parameter.
> By inspection, I believe that all drivers would treat this as
> GL_READ_WRITE bec
From: Ian Romanick
The code previously passed GL_DYNAMIC_DRAW for the access parameter.
By inspection, I believe that all drivers would treat this as
GL_READ_WRITE because it's not GL_READ_ONLY and it's not
GL_WRITE_ONLY. However, my guess is that this code actually wants to
use GL_WRITE_ONLY.
