Matt Turner writes:
> I think when this code was written, basic blocks were always ended by a
> control flow instruction or an end-of-thread message. That's no longer
> the case, and removing this restriction actually helps things:
>
>instructions in affected programs: 7267 -> 7244 (-0.32%)
>
I think when this code was written, basic blocks were always ended by a
control flow instruction or an end-of-thread message. That's no longer
the case, and removing this restriction actually helps things:
instructions in affected programs: 7267 -> 7244 (-0.32%)
helped: 4
total cycles in
