On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 10.06.2017 01:47, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>
>> From: Connor Abbott
>>
>> We're about to bump the number of system values above 32. The
>> system_values_read bitfield itself is 64 bits, but some users weren't
>> taking that into account. Fi
On 10.06.2017 01:47, Connor Abbott wrote:
From: Connor Abbott
We're about to bump the number of system values above 32. The
system_values_read bitfield itself is 64 bits, but some users weren't
taking that into account. Fix the ones I could find by grepping for
"system_values_read". This preven
From: Connor Abbott
We're about to bump the number of system values above 32. The
system_values_read bitfield itself is 64 bits, but some users weren't
taking that into account. Fix the ones I could find by grepping for
"system_values_read". This prevents regressions at least with radeonsi
and ot