On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 15:58 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Timothy Arceri
> wrote:
> > This removes the need for multiple functions designed to validate an array
> > subscript and replaces them with a call to a single function.
> >
> > The change also means that val
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> This removes the need for multiple functions designed to validate an array
> subscript and replaces them with a call to a single function.
>
> The change also means that validation is now only done once and the index
> is retrived at the sam
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 14:21 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 12:26 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:07 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > On 07/30/2015 08:56 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > > On 07/30/2015 08:50 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > > > > On 30 July 2015 3:27:41
On 07/30/2015 12:26 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:07 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:56 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:50 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 30 July 2015 3:27:41 pm AEST, "Tapani Pälli"
wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:25 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
H
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:07 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 08:56 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > On 07/30/2015 08:50 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > >
> > > On 30 July 2015 3:27:41 pm AEST, "Tapani Pälli"
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 07/30/2015 08:25 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > > > Hi Timothy
On 07/30/2015 08:56 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:50 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 30 July 2015 3:27:41 pm AEST, "Tapani Pälli"
wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:25 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Timothy;
Would it be OK for you to wait a bit with these 3 first patches? I'm
currently going thro
On 07/30/2015 08:50 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 30 July 2015 3:27:41 pm AEST, "Tapani Pälli" wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:25 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Timothy;
Would it be OK for you to wait a bit with these 3 first patches? I'm
currently going through failing PIQ tests and I have a 1 line fix
On 30 July 2015 3:27:41 pm AEST, "Tapani Pälli" wrote:
>On 07/30/2015 08:25 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>> Hi Timothy;
>>
>> Would it be OK for you to wait a bit with these 3 first patches? I'm
>> currently going through failing PIQ tests and I have a 1 line fix to
>> valid_program_resource_index_
On 07/30/2015 08:25 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Timothy;
Would it be OK for you to wait a bit with these 3 first patches? I'm
currently going through failing PIQ tests and I have a 1 line fix to
valid_program_resource_index_name() that together with your patch
"glsl: set stage flag for structs
Hi Timothy;
Would it be OK for you to wait a bit with these 3 first patches? I'm
currently going through failing PIQ tests and I have a 1 line fix to
valid_program_resource_index_name() that together with your patch "glsl:
set stage flag for structs and arrays in resource list" will fix all of
This removes the need for multiple functions designed to validate an array
subscript and replaces them with a call to a single function.
The change also means that validation is now only done once and the index
is retrived at the same time, as a result the getUniformLocation code can
be simplified
11 matches
Mail list logo
