Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/15] intel: Remove dead code in intelAllocateBuffer

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Berry
On 23 July 2012 09:15, Eric Anholt wrote: > Chris Wilson writes: > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:36:40 -0700, Chad Versace < > chad.vers...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> After commit "intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers", we > >> request from DRI2GetBuffersWithFormat only the front

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/15] intel: Remove dead code in intelAllocateBuffer

2012-07-23 Thread Eric Anholt
Chris Wilson writes: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:36:40 -0700, Chad Versace > wrote: >> After commit "intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers", we >> request from DRI2GetBuffersWithFormat only the front left and back left >> buffers. We no longer request depth and stencil buffers. >>

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/15] intel: Remove dead code in intelAllocateBuffer

2012-07-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:36:40 -0700, Chad Versace wrote: > After commit "intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers", we > request from DRI2GetBuffersWithFormat only the front left and back left > buffers. We no longer request depth and stencil buffers. > > Assert that in intelAllocate

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/15] intel: Remove dead code in intelAllocateBuffer

2012-07-21 Thread Chad Versace
After commit "intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers", we request from DRI2GetBuffersWithFormat only the front left and back left buffers. We no longer request depth and stencil buffers. Assert that in intelAllocateBuffer and remove the related dead code. CC: Eric Anholt Signed-of