2015-05-18 1:46 GMT+08:00 Chih-Wei Huang :
> 2015-05-16 2:46 GMT+08:00 Ilia Mirkin :
>> Please elaborate why this is necessary. I have, in the past, had
>> requests to move to the C++11 std::unordered_set -- would that work
>> for you? I'd be happy with a #if c++11 is available, use
>> std::unorder
2015-05-16 2:46 GMT+08:00 Ilia Mirkin :
> Please elaborate why this is necessary. I have, in the past, had
> requests to move to the C++11 std::unordered_set -- would that work
> for you? I'd be happy with a #if c++11 is available, use
> std::unordered_set. Otherwise use std::tr1::unordered_set.
H
Please elaborate why this is necessary. I have, in the past, had
requests to move to the C++11 std::unordered_set -- would that work
for you? I'd be happy with a #if c++11 is available, use
std::unordered_set. Otherwise use std::tr1::unordered_set.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
Instead of using unordered_set directly, the patch
changes to use unordered_set and adds a wrapper template class
to convert the iterators to the expected user-defined type.
This avoid instantiating the template multiple times and make it be
more compatible with stlport.
Signed-off-by: Chih-Wei H
