On 15/05/15 18:29, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 05/14/2015 03:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> On 13/05/15 19:44, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> We've known for a long time that having all those tags in the
>>> entries in the XML is bad. For example, people cut-and-paste for
>>> everything, and,
On 05/14/2015 03:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 13/05/15 19:44, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> We've known for a long time that having all those tags in the
>> entries in the XML is bad. For example, people cut-and-paste for
>> everything, and, as a result, we export a bunch of functions th
Hi Ian,
On 13/05/15 19:44, Ian Romanick wrote:
> We've known for a long time that having all those tags in the
> entries in the XML is bad. For example, people cut-and-paste for
> everything, and, as a result, we export a bunch of functions that we
> should not. We also really want to just use
On 05/13/2015 12:44 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> We've known for a long time that having all those tags in the
> entries in the XML is bad. For example, people cut-and-paste for
> everything, and, as a result, we export a bunch of functions that we
> should not. We also really want to just use the
We've known for a long time that having all those tags in the
entries in the XML is bad. For example, people cut-and-paste for
everything, and, as a result, we export a bunch of functions that we
should not. We also really want to just use the Khronos XML.
This series takes a couple small steps
