On 04/14/2015 11:02 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
Hi Samuel,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
Hello Robert,
Sorry for the delay, I just saw your message few days ago, and I probably
removed the mail by mistake too...
And then I was on holiday; so more delay :-)
I have ne
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 01:56:32 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> I would prefer to keep support for AMD_performance_monitor in mesa.
> We may implement more extensive support for this extension in our
> radeon open source drivers and it would be nice to be compatible with
> our closed source drivers on
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> I thought I should let you and others know of some related changes
>> I've been playing around with to try and improve our support for the
>> INTEL_performance_query ext
Hi Samuel,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> Sorry for the delay, I just saw your message few days ago, and I probably
> removed the mail by mistake too...
And then I was on holiday; so more delay :-)
>
> I have never heard about your work on this area,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I thought I should let you and others know of some related changes
> I've been playing around with to try and improve our support for the
> INTEL_performance_query extension in the i965 dri driver, since it's
> quite related to
Hello Robert,
Sorry for the delay, I just saw your message few days ago, and I
probably removed the mail by mistake too...
I have never heard about your work on this area, happy to know right now. :)
Well, regarding the backend stuff, I would prefer to keep the same for
both GL_AMD_performan
Hi Samuel,
I thought I should let you and others know of some related changes
I've been playing around with to try and improve our support for the
INTEL_performance_query extension in the i965 dri driver, since it's
quite related to your work.
Some of my work-in-progress changes can currently be
On 03/18/2015 06:13 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
The Gallium interface looked good to me (except where I replied).
Sorry, I probably won't have time to review the st/mesa patch.
Ok, thank you. I'll submit a v2 for that.
Marek
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
Bump, is so
The Gallium interface looked good to me (except where I replied).
Sorry, I probably won't have time to review the st/mesa patch.
Marek
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
> Bump, is someone want to make a review of this patch set ? Especially the
> "core" stuff...
>
>
> On 03
Bump, is someone want to make a review of this patch set ? Especially
the "core" stuff...
On 03/09/2015 10:09 PM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Hello,
A series I have waited too long to re-submit, but I recently refactored the
code and fixed some minor issues.
This patchset enables GL_AMD_performanc
Hello,
A series I have waited too long to re-submit, but I recently refactored the
code and fixed some minor issues.
This patchset enables GL_AMD_performance_monitor for svga, freedreno, r600,
radeonsi and nvc0 drivers.
This code has been tested with Nouveau (NVD9 and NVE7) but it should also wo
11 matches
Mail list logo
