On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 13:43 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
> On 11/8/18 1:02 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> >
> > On 11/8/18 11:53 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > > On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:
On 11/8/18 1:02 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 11/8/18 11:53 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail w
On 11/8/18 11:53 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this
series
running on Intel CI. It inc
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this
> > > series
> > > running on Intel CI. It includes dEQP but also Piglit
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 09:54 +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > > FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this
> > > >
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this
> > > series
> > > running on Intel CI. It includes dEQP but also Piglit
On 11/8/18 10:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this series
running on Intel CI. It includes dEQP but also Piglit tests, can you
do
Intel CI run or do you want me to send you results?
If
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:47 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this series
> running on Intel CI. It includes dEQP but also Piglit tests, can you
> do
> Intel CI run or do you want me to send you results?
If you mean mesa-ci.01.org, then I have
FYI there's a whole lot of tests that start to fail when this series
running on Intel CI. It includes dEQP but also Piglit tests, can you do
Intel CI run or do you want me to send you results?
// Tapani
On 11/7/18 5:58 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
Here's a bunch of patches for missing error gene
Here's a bunch of patches for missing error generation in the query
buffer code.
The general pattern, is that code that directly checks
ctx->Extensions.FOO_bar instead of using _mesa_has_FOO_bar(ctx) will
often end up drawing the wrong conclusion on ES, because the flag in
ctx->Extensions only tel
10 matches
Mail list logo
