On Friday, October 14, 2016 11:11:11 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This is a fairly trivial little cleanup that makes a bunch of 1-bit fields
> that used to have the "uint" type have the "bool" type instead. Ideally, a
> field should have the "bool" type if and only if, given the name of the
> fi
This is a fairly trivial little cleanup that makes a bunch of 1-bit fields
that used to have the "uint" type have the "bool" type instead. Ideally, a
field should have the "bool" type if and only if, given the name of the
field and a true/false value, it's obvious what that value means. I think
t
