On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:22 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák
wrote:
> Is ther
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:22 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák
>>> wrote:
>>> > Is there any user of this extension?
>>>
>>> Based on the spec, it
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:22 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák
>> wrote:
>> > Is there any user of this extension?
>>
>> Based on the spec, it seems like it would be useful for glamor. No
>> idea is anyo
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:22 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák
>>> wrote:
>>> > Is there any user of this extension?
>>>
>>> Based on the spec, it
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:22 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák
>> wrote:
>> > Is there any user of this extension?
>>
>> Based on the spec, it seems like it would be useful for glamor. No
>> idea is anyo
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:22 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák
> wrote:
> > Is there any user of this extension?
>
> Based on the spec, it seems like it would be useful for glamor. No
> idea is anyone has code to use it yet.
Actually me, robclark and airlie
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Is there any user of this extension?
Based on the spec, it seems like it would be useful for glamor. No
idea is anyone has code to use it yet.
Alex
>
> Marek
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Lyude wrote:
>> This adds basic support for
Is there any user of this extension?
Marek
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Lyude wrote:
> This adds basic support for GL_NV_fill_rectangle in Gallium, along with
> enabling it for the GM200+ in nouveau. It should be noted this only
> implements the OpenGL 4.3 bits, since we don't have the featu
Nice work!
Usually, gallium bits come *after* mesa ones, like:
mesa:
gallium:
st/mesa:
On 03/23/2017 04:27 PM, Lyude wrote:
This adds basic support for GL_NV_fill_rectangle in Gallium, along with
enabling it for the GM200+ in nouveau. It should be noted this only
implements the OpenGL 4.3 bits
This adds basic support for GL_NV_fill_rectangle in Gallium, along with
enabling it for the GM200+ in nouveau. It should be noted this only
implements the OpenGL 4.3 bits, since we don't have the features required
yet to add this for OpenGLES.
Lyude (6):
glapi: Add GL_NV_fill_rectangle
gallium
10 matches
Mail list logo