On August 29, 2017 3:00:51 PM Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 3:48:29 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
This little series changes things around so that, instead of passing MOCS
values into ISL, ISL knows how to set them itself. This allows us to
centralize some of the decisions
On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 3:48:29 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This little series changes things around so that, instead of passing MOCS
> values into ISL, ISL knows how to set them itself. This allows us to
> centralize some of the decisions about how MOCS gets set for surfaces and
> hopefully
Ken,
Did you ever look at this?
--Jason
On August 23, 2017 12:50:25 AM "Pohjolainen, Topi"
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:48:29PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
This little series changes things around so that, instead of passing MOCS
values into ISL, ISL knows how to set them itself.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:48:29PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This little series changes things around so that, instead of passing MOCS
> values into ISL, ISL knows how to set them itself. This allows us to
> centralize some of the decisions about how MOCS gets set for surfaces and
> hopefully
This little series changes things around so that, instead of passing MOCS
values into ISL, ISL knows how to set them itself. This allows us to
centralize some of the decisions about how MOCS gets set for surfaces and
hopefully, if we ever do anything crazy in the future, we can share it
between GL
