On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 17:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 29 January 2017 at 23:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29.
On 1 February 2017 at 17:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 29 January 2017 at 23:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017, 22:31:55 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
> On Sat, J
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 29 January 2017 at 23:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>>> Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017, 22:31:55 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am
On 29 January 2017 at 23:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017, 22:31:55 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>>> > Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 16:09:29 CET schrieb Marek Olšák
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017, 22:31:55 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>> > Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 16:09:29 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017, 22:31:55 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 16:09:29 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin
wrote:
> >> > Can you explain why it's a desirable goal to b
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 16:09:29 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > Can you explain why it's a desirable goal to be able to build radv without
>> > --enable-gallium-llvm? Perhaps it's ob
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 16:09:29 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > Can you explain why it's a desirable goal to be able to build radv without
> > --enable-gallium-llvm? Perhaps it's obvious, but I'm not seeing it.
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2017 8:57
This is what was allowed from the beginning, this just unbreaks the build.
I had a different solution for this, but this was shut down by Jose.
See:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2017-January/141263.html
and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99010
Am Samstag, 28. Ja
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Can you explain why it's a desirable goal to be able to build radv without
> --enable-gallium-llvm? Perhaps it's obvious, but I'm not seeing it.
>
> On Jan 28, 2017 8:57 AM, "Tobias Droste" wrote:
>
> This is a reworked series of the previous
Can you explain why it's a desirable goal to be able to build radv without
--enable-gallium-llvm? Perhaps it's obvious, but I'm not seeing it.
On Jan 28, 2017 8:57 AM, "Tobias Droste" wrote:
This is a reworked series of the previous LLVM related changes to
configure.ac that were reverted due to
This is a reworked series of the previous LLVM related changes to
configure.ac that were reverted due to breaking scons.
This takes a different approach to the previous series and adds an
extra define for LLVM version checks if RADV is build.
This allows to build RADV with "--disable-gallium-llv
12 matches
Mail list logo
