On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 04/01/2014 06:18 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
>>> - Original Message -
From: Rob Clark
While still more of a stop-gap solution (until glamor) for freedreno,
wit
On 04/01/2014 06:18 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>>
>>> While still more of a stop-gap solution (until glamor) for freedreno,
>>> with these few relatively simple changes I get a pretty big performan
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> While still more of a stop-gap solution (until glamor) for freedreno,
>> with these few relatively simple changes I get a pretty big performance
>> boost (~40%) for xf86-video-freedreno.
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: Rob Clark
>
> While still more of a stop-gap solution (until glamor) for freedreno,
> with these few relatively simple changes I get a pretty big performance
> boost (~40%) for xf86-video-freedreno.
That looks great to me. Nice work.
But to be honest the only
From: Rob Clark
While still more of a stop-gap solution (until glamor) for freedreno,
with these few relatively simple changes I get a pretty big performance
boost (~40%) for xf86-video-freedreno.
Rob Clark (4):
xa: handle solid-fill src/mask
xa: remove unneeded args
xa: scissor to help ti