On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 13:50 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This tiny series converts nir_var_mode to be a bitfield instead of a
> regular enum and then converts two of the passes that currently take a mode
> to handle the new bitfield. The reason for this is that a number of
> different passes wan
On Apr 12, 2016 7:52 AM, "Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen"
wrote:
>
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > This tiny series converts nir_var_mode to be a bitfield instead of a
> > regular enum and then converts two of the passes that currently take a
mode
> > to handle the new bitfield. The reason for this is
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
>> This tiny series converts nir_var_mode to be a bitfield instead of a
>> regular enum and then converts two of the passes that currently take a mode
>> to handle the new bitfield. The reason for this is that a numbe
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> This tiny series converts nir_var_mode to be a bitfield instead of a
> regular enum and then converts two of the passes that currently take a mode
> to handle the new bitfield. The reason for this is that a number of
> different passes want to be able to act on some subs
This tiny series converts nir_var_mode to be a bitfield instead of a
regular enum and then converts two of the passes that currently take a mode
to handle the new bitfield. The reason for this is that a number of
different passes want to be able to act on some subset of the modes and can
run more
