Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Refactor handling of extension strings

2011-01-11 Thread Chia-I Wu
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chad Versace wrote: > I am refactoring the method by which extension strings are handled in > mesa/main/extensions.c. If there are no objections, regressions, nor > significantly better refactoring alternatives proposed, then I plan to push > the patch set on Frida

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Refactor handling of extension strings

2011-01-10 Thread Chad Versace
On 01/09/2011 11:23 PM, Chad Versace wrote: > Regressions > === > I would appreciate it if someone would take the time check for Piglit > regressions on non-Intel. Also, if anyone has access to a GLES1/2 test suite, > I would like to know if this causes any GLES1/2 regressions. If you woul

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Refactor handling of extension strings

2011-01-10 Thread Brian Paul
On 01/10/2011 12:23 AM, Chad Versace wrote: I am refactoring the method by which extension strings are handled in mesa/main/extensions.c. If there are no objections, regressions, nor significantly better refactoring alternatives proposed, then I plan to push the patch set on Friday 14. Regressio

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Refactor handling of extension strings

2011-01-09 Thread Chad Versace
I am refactoring the method by which extension strings are handled in mesa/main/extensions.c. If there are no objections, regressions, nor significantly better refactoring alternatives proposed, then I plan to push the patch set on Friday 14. Regressions === The patch set causes no Piglit