On 08/02/2016 08:45 AM, ⚛ wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
In bufferobj.c, it looks like we're just using %d or %s and casting the
arguments to int. But in other places, we're using %ld and casting to long.
That's not going to accurately report 64-bit values, but I gues
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> In bufferobj.c, it looks like we're just using %d or %s and casting the
> arguments to int. But in other places, we're using %ld and casting to long.
> That's not going to accurately report 64-bit values, but I guess that hasn't
> been a concern
On 08/01/2016 04:35 PM, Jan Ziak wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
---
src/mesa/vbo/vbo_exec_array.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/vbo/vbo_exec_array.c b/src/mesa/vbo/vbo_exec_array.c
index 90f1
Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
---
src/mesa/vbo/vbo_exec_array.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/vbo/vbo_exec_array.c b/src/mesa/vbo/vbo_exec_array.c
index 90f1321..fe74c73 100644
--- a/src/mesa/vbo/vbo_e
