Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:53 AM, wrote:
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> I think this is what the code was meant to do, albeit as far as I can tell
> the redundant initialization some analyzers complain about should work as
> well just fine (only the first layer wi
Am 01.09.2017 um 02:32 schrieb Brian Paul:
> On 08/31/2017 05:53 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> I think this is what the code was meant to do, albeit as far as I can
>> tell
>> the redundant initialization some analyzers complain about should work as
>> well just f
On 08/31/2017 05:53 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
I think this is what the code was meant to do, albeit as far as I can tell
the redundant initialization some analyzers complain about should work as
well just fine (only the first layer will be used, if the view contains
From: Roland Scheidegger
I think this is what the code was meant to do, albeit as far as I can tell
the redundant initialization some analyzers complain about should work as
well just fine (only the first layer will be used, if the view contains one
or more layers doesn't really matter).
Bugzill
