- Original Message -
> On 05/09/2014 02:55 AM, jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
> > From: José Fonseca
> >
> > That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
> > ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
> >
> > Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive
On 05/09/2014 02:55 AM, jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
> From: José Fonseca
>
> That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
> ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
>
> Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive license.
> ---
> src/glsl/ralloc.h | 7 ++
- Original Message -
> On 05/09/2014 12:48 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:55 AM, wrote:
> >>> From: José Fonseca
> >>>
> >>> That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
> >>> ralloc itself is relea
On 05/09/2014 12:48 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:55 AM, wrote:
>>> From: José Fonseca
>>>
>>> That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
>>> ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
>>>
>>> Instead, simply state
- Original Message -
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:55 AM, wrote:
> > From: José Fonseca
> >
> > That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
> > ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
> >
> > Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive license.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:55 AM, wrote:
> From: José Fonseca
>
> That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
> ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
>
> Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive license.
> ---
> src/glsl/ralloc.h | 7 +++
> 1 f
On 05/09/2014 02:55 AM, jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
> From: José Fonseca
>
> That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
> ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
>
> Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive license.
> ---
> src/glsl/ralloc.h | 7 ++
On 05/09/2014 03:55 AM, jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
From: José Fonseca
That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive license.
---
src/glsl/ralloc.h | 7 +++
1 fil
From: José Fonseca
That information misleads source code auditing tools to think that
ralloc itself is released under LGPL v3.
Instead, simply state talloc is not licensed under a permissive license.
---
src/glsl/ralloc.h | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git