Hi Emil,
Yeah, that looks correct, Thanks!
On 12/5/18 4:22 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi guys
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 10:49, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
In case we are unlucky if the low part is 0x.
F
Hi guys
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 10:49, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM Samuel Pitoiset
> wrote:
> >
> > In case we are unlucky if the low part is 0x.
> >
> > Fixes: 5d6a560a29 ("radv: do not use the availability bit for timesta
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
>
> In case we are unlucky if the low part is 0x.
>
> Fixes: 5d6a560a29 ("radv: do not use the availability bit for timestamp
> queries")
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
> ---
> src/amd/vulkan/radv_q
In case we are unlucky if the low part is 0x.
Fixes: 5d6a560a29 ("radv: do not use the availability bit for timestamp
queries")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_query.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_quer