Pushed, thanks.
Marek
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Attach piglit patch to add the test can someone commit ? It seems i
> don't have the right for that.
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>
> ___
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.fre
Attach piglit patch to add the test can someone commit ? It seems i
don't have the right for that.
Cheers,
Jerome
0001-glsl-fs-loop-diagonal-break-new-test-for-loop-break.patch
Description: Binary data
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedeskt
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Fabian Bieler wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> In R700-family_instruction_set_architecture.pdf
>>> pages 3-18 and 9-34 read that pop instructions never jump.
>
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Fabian Bieler wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> In R700-family_instruction_set_architecture.pdf
>> pages 3-18 and 9-34 read that pop instructions never jump.
>> The table on page 3-16 however reads that it does jump if t
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Fabian Bieler wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In R700-family_instruction_set_architecture.pdf
> pages 3-18 and 9-34 read that pop instructions never jump.
> The table on page 3-16 however reads that it does jump if the condition test
> fails for all pixels.
>
> On RV710 the att
Hello!
In R700-family_instruction_set_architecture.pdf
pages 3-18 and 9-34 read that pop instructions never jump.
The table on page 3-16 however reads that it does jump if the condition test
fails for all pixels.
On RV710 the attached piglit test indicates that the pop instruction does
indeed j
