>>
>> It might be for this test, but I don't think it is in general. We want
>> boolean
>> which I think is 0 or 0x, not 0.0 or 1.0.
>
> The initial alu reg write was 0x, and the resinfo gives you back
> a fixed 0, so...
Doh I just noticed it now, my brain had a copy of the older
Am 02.02.2018 um 00:23 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> On 2 February 2018 at 09:23, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On 2 February 2018 at 02:05, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Dave Airlie:
From: Dave Airlie
This passes the CTS and piglit tests.
This also disab
On 2 February 2018 at 09:23, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 2 February 2018 at 02:05, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Am 01.02.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>> From: Dave Airlie
>>>
>>> This passes the CTS and piglit tests.
>>>
>>> This also disable sb for helper invocations until it doesn't
>>> mes
On 2 February 2018 at 02:05, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 01.02.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> This passes the CTS and piglit tests.
>>
>> This also disable sb for helper invocations until it doesn't
>> mess up the VPM flags.
>>
>> Thanks to Ilia and Glenn for adv
Am 01.02.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This passes the CTS and piglit tests.
>
> This also disable sb for helper invocations until it doesn't
> mess up the VPM flags.
>
> Thanks to Ilia and Glenn for advice, and Roland for working
> out the working evergreen path.
>
From: Dave Airlie
This passes the CTS and piglit tests.
This also disable sb for helper invocations until it doesn't
mess up the VPM flags.
Thanks to Ilia and Glenn for advice, and Roland for working
out the working evergreen path.
---
src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_asm.c| 7 +-
src/galli
