Hello guys,
Can anyone backport the following patches for 10.3 and let me know if
we should drop them.
They have a bunch of non-trivial conflicts, thus i would rather avoid
butchering things up.
38ec1844193570486bf35e25a7a4339a00da127e r600: fix texture gradients
instruction emission (v2)
c883856
Hello Dave,
Cherry picking this commit for the 10.3 branch resulted in a number of
non-trivial conflicts. Can you or anyone else familiar with the code
backport this for 10.3 ?
Thanks
Emil
On 18/11/14 22:53, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> The piglit tests were failing, and it appea
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:53:23 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie
The piglit tests were failing, and it appeared to be SB
optimising out things, but Glenn pointed out the gradients
are meant to be clause local, so we should emit the texture
instructions in the same clause. This moves t
From: Dave Airlie
The piglit tests were failing, and it appeared to be SB
optimising out things, but Glenn pointed out the gradients
are meant to be clause local, so we should emit the texture
instructions in the same clause. This moves things around
to always copy to a temp and then emit the tex
From: Dave Airlie
The piglit tests were failing, and it appeared to be SB
optimising out things, but Glenn pointed out the gradients
are meant to be clause local, so we should emit the texture
instructions in the same clause. This moves things around
to always copy to a temp and then emit the tex
