> It doesn't, but the inside of your caching function should probably be
> using it.
Ah, I see, fair point :)
Will we want this caching to be moved up to shared Gallium or no?
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.free
Alyssa Rosenzweig writes:
>> Can you reuse u_vbuf_get_minmax_index()?
>
> From a preliminary read, it didn't look like that did caching?
It doesn't, but the inside of your caching function should probably be
using it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
> Can you reuse u_vbuf_get_minmax_index()?
From a preliminary read, it didn't look like that did caching?
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Alyssa Rosenzweig writes:
> This code is probably a wholesale duplication of the corresponding code
> in mesa/src/vbo/vbo_minmax_indices.c; we should investigate reusing
> that.
Can you reuse u_vbuf_get_minmax_index()?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
This code is probably a wholesale duplication of the corresponding code
in mesa/src/vbo/vbo_minmax_indices.c; we should investigate reusing
that.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
---
src/gallium/drivers/panfrost/pan_context.c | 108 ++--
src/gallium/drivers/panfrost/pan_resource
