Vinson Lee wrote:
I would like this to be reviewed before it is committed.
The current implementation and this patch doesn't address the potential
existing case where count is erroneously initialized with zero.
That can be a separate patch.
Do you mean add assert(count > 0) in pipe_barrier_i
I would like this to be reviewed before it is committed.
The current implementation and this patch doesn't address the potential
existing case where count is erroneously initialized with zero.
That can be a separate patch.
os: Check for spurious wakeups in pipe_barrier_wait.
Add a 64-bit count
