On 4/15/19 10:55 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 15/4/19 5:53 pm, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Shouldn't we also apply that fix in gather_varying_component_info() ?
No because we don't enter that code path for arrays because we don't
try to pack arrays into other slots/components. But we do pack sca
On 15/4/19 5:53 pm, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Shouldn't we also apply that fix in gather_varying_component_info() ?
No because we don't enter that code path for arrays because we don't try
to pack arrays into other slots/components. But we do pack scalar
components with "unmovable" arrays when
Shouldn't we also apply that fix in gather_varying_component_info() ?
On 4/15/19 7:00 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
When gathering info for unmovable types we need to handle arrays.
While we dont support packing/moving arrays we do support packing
scalar components with these arrays.
Fixes piglit:
When gathering info for unmovable types we need to handle arrays.
While we dont support packing/moving arrays we do support packing
scalar components with these arrays.
Fixes piglit:
tests/spec/arb_enhanced_layouts/execution/component-layout/vs-fs-array-interleave-range.shader_test
Fixes: 5eb1750