Seems reasonable to be too. Rb if you'd like
On Aug 2, 2016 8:25 PM, "Timothy Arceri"
wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri
> ___
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
_
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Previously we would not print a swizzle on ssa_52 when only its .x
component is used (as seen in the definition of ssa_53):
vec3 ssa_52 = fadd ssa_51, ssa_51
vec1 ssa_53 = flog2 ssa_52
vec1 ssa_54 = flog2 ssa_52.y
vec1 ssa_55 = flog2 ssa_52.z
But this makes the interpretation of the R