On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
> W
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
We weren't comparing the right number of components when check
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> We weren't comparing the right number of components when checking
>>> swizzles. Use nir_ssa_alu_instr_num_src_components()
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> We weren't comparing the right number of components when checking
>> swizzles. Use nir_ssa_alu_instr_num_src_components() to do the right
>
> I don't like the name of that function,
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick
As soon as it lands, I'll rebase and push my patch.
On 04/14/2015 12:51 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> We weren't comparing the right number of components when checking
> swizzles. Use nir_ssa_alu_instr_num_src_components() to do the right
> thing.
>
> I haven't piglited t
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> We weren't comparing the right number of components when checking
> swizzles. Use nir_ssa_alu_instr_num_src_components() to do the right
I don't like the name of that function, but oh well.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
> thing.
>
> I have
We weren't comparing the right number of components when checking
swizzles. Use nir_ssa_alu_instr_num_src_components() to do the right
thing.
I haven't piglited this yet, but it seems straightforward.
Cc: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott
---
src/glsl/nir/nir_opt_cse.c | 17 +++
