"Rogovin, Kevin" writes:
> Hi all, I will later submit a patch taking into account comments, however one
> comment I will address *now*.
>
> Eric Anholt [e...@anholt.net] writes:
>
>>Kevin Rogovin writes:
>>
>>> This patch adds a function interface for enabling no wrap on batch commands,
>>>add
2nd dry was recorded as
sent after the correct run.
If people want, I can send it out again with a different subject, but the
details of the message are:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-November/048257.html
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nicer-no-wrap-patch
Kevin Rogovin kevin.rogovin
Track bytes written during no flush phases for debug builds
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 85 +++
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c | 4 +-
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c | 15 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchb
feedback integrated
space-pace
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 85 +++
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c | 4 +-
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c | 15 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h | 6 ++
4 files change
feedback integrated
space-pace
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 85 +++
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c | 4 +-
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c | 15 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h | 6 ++
4 files change
ktop.org
Cc: Rogovin, Kevin
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nicer-no-wrap-patch
Kevin Rogovin writes:
> This patch adds a function interface for enabling no wrap on batch commands,
> adds to it assert enforcement that the number bytes added to the
> batch buffer does not exceed a passed value
Kevin Rogovin writes:
> This patch adds a function interface for enabling no wrap on batch commands,
> adds to it assert enforcement that the number bytes added to the
> batch buffer does not exceed a passed value and finally this is used
> in brw_try_draw_prims() to help make sure that estimated
On 11/11/2013 01:35 AM, Kevin Rogovin wrote:
> This patch adds a function interface for enabling no wrap on batch commands,
> adds to it assert enforcement that the number bytes added to the
> batch buffer does not exceed a passed value and finally this is used
> in brw_try_draw_prims() to help mak
Need a better commit message. I like the kernel's guidelines which
remind us that the summary becomes the globally-unique identifier for
the patch.
Style comments:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Kevin Rogovin wrote:
> This patch adds a function interface for enabling no wrap on batch commands,
This patch adds a function interface for enabling no wrap on batch commands,
adds to it assert enforcement that the number bytes added to the
batch buffer does not exceed a passed value and finally this is used
in brw_try_draw_prims() to help make sure that estimated_max_prim_size
is a good value.
10 matches
Mail list logo