Am 2015-09-10 04:00, schrieb Anuj Phogat:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ian Romanick
wrote:
On 09/09/2015 04:55 PM, Anuj Phogat wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Ian Romanick
wrote:
I'm pretty sure our implementation of this extension is complete
rubbish. I have attached an image f
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 04:55 PM, Anuj Phogat wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Ian Romanick
wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure our implementation of this extension is complete
>>> rubbish. I have attached an image from the blit-scaled test. This
>>>
On 09/09/2015 04:55 PM, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure our implementation of this extension is complete
>> rubbish. I have attached an image from the blit-scaled test. This
>> result cannot be useful to anyone.
>>
> Paul Berry and I a
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> I'm pretty sure our implementation of this extension is complete
> rubbish. I have attached an image from the blit-scaled test. This
> result cannot be useful to anyone.
>
Resending it with link to the image in place of big attachment.
Paul
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> Previously the result of the complicated clamp() expression just dropped
> on the floor: clamp does not modify any of its parameters. Looking at
> the surrounding code, I believe this is supposed to modify the value of
In case it's of any interest, nouveau fails many of the blit-scaled
tests. However nouveau's MS blits are notoriously bad. [I think I know
what's wrong, just don't have the energy to fix it.]
OTOH the NVIDIA driver also fails at every scale factor (for 2x and
8x, passes for 4x).
On Wed, Sep 9, 20
I'm pretty sure our implementation of this extension is complete
rubbish. I have attached an image from the blit-scaled test. This
result cannot be useful to anyone.
On 09/09/2015 11:16 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 11:13 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> Previously
On 09/09/2015 11:13 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> Previously the result of the complicated clamp() expression just dropped
> on the floor: clamp does not modify any of its parameters. Looking at
> the surrounding code, I believe this is supposed to modify the value of
> tex_co
From: Ian Romanick
Previously the result of the complicated clamp() expression just dropped
on the floor: clamp does not modify any of its parameters. Looking at
the surrounding code, I believe this is supposed to modify the value of
tex_coord.
This change (along with a change to avoid the use
