On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:01:26 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:06:03 -0800
> > Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> >> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:06:03 -0800
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
>> > ---
>>
>> Tha
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:06:03 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
> > ---
>
> Thanks, R-b and pushed.
Apparently this commit also fixed non-x86 bu
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
>
> Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
> ---
Thanks, R-b and pushed.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.f
On 12/19/2013 01:50 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:57:16 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen
It seems to me that the Intel code that uses this SSE4.1 function
is still buggy, as it has no runtime check - would it not crash
if built on a
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
---
configure.ac| 6
m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4 | 72 +
src/mesa/Makefile.am| 6 +++-
3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletio
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:57:16 -0800
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>> > Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
>>
>> Make this "Bugzilla: ..."
>
> Sure, will do. But there a
On 12/19/2013 01:50 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
[snip]
> Gallium has a cpu detect function that includes a SSE 4.1 cap. Perhaps
> you'd like to move it to a common area and make use of it for runtime
> detection?
Yes, that would be far better. The Mesa code has really rotted - it
only does CPU detec
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:57:16 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> > Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
>
> Make this "Bugzilla: ..."
Sure, will do. But there are both conventions used, for example see:
0b16042377a
8bc7673ef87
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Make this "Bugzilla: ..."
> It seems to me that the Intel code that uses this SSE4.1 function
> is still buggy, as it has no runtime check - would it not crash
> if built on a SSE4-c
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
It seems to me that the Intel code that uses this SSE4.1 function
is still buggy, as it has no runtime check - would it not crash
if built on a SSE4-capable system but used with a lower-class cpu?
i965 systems = LGA775 = Pentium4 without S
11 matches
Mail list logo
