Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-01-18 16:44:18)
> On 1/17/2018 7:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation
> > for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is
> > already using the naming scheme internally, and now we
On 1/17/2018 7:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation
for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is
already using the naming scheme internally, and now we are looking at
updating some soft-ABI such as the error
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 7:47:05 AM PST Chris Wilson wrote:
> The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation
> for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is
> already using the naming scheme internally, and now we are looking at
> updating so
The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation
for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is
already using the naming scheme internally, and now we are looking at
updating some soft-ABI such as the error state to use the new naming
scheme. This of
