On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 13:14 +0800, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Steven Newbury
>> wrote:
>> > Forgot to add signed-off-by...
>> >
>> > In trying to get gallium-nine working with the ilo Gallium driver I
>> > noticed
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 13:14 +0800, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > Forgot to add signed-off-by...
> >
> > In trying to get gallium-nine working with the ilo Gallium driver I
> > noticed there's no ilo pipe-loader driver being built.
> >
> > This patch
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Steven Newbury wrote:
> Forgot to add signed-off-by...
>
> In trying to get gallium-nine working with the ilo Gallium driver I
> noticed there's no ilo pipe-loader driver being built.
>
> This patch simply puts in place the missing pieces.
>
> The driver descriptor
Forgot to add signed-off-by...
In trying to get gallium-nine working with the ilo Gallium driver I
noticed there's no ilo pipe-loader driver being built.
This patch simply puts in place the missing pieces.
The driver descriptor is named "ilo", rather than "i965" as the ilo DRI
driver currently n
In trying to get gallium-nine working with the ilo Gallium driver I
noticed there's no ilo pipe-loader driver being built.
This patch simply puts in place the missing pieces.
The driver descriptor is named "ilo", rather than "i965" as the ilo DRI
driver currently names itself, this is necessary a
