On 14 July 2017 at 20:13, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Antognolli
> wrote:
>> gen4 have commands which start with KernelStartPointer, which is a
>> struct, so if we initialize it struct = { 0 }, we get warnings on some
>> compilers.
>
> Which compilers?
>
GCC (pre
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Rafael Antognolli
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:13:59PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Antognolli
>> wrote:
>> > gen4 have commands which start with KernelStartPointer, which is a
>> > struct, so if we initialize it st
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:13:59PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Antognolli
> wrote:
> > gen4 have commands which start with KernelStartPointer, which is a
> > struct, so if we initialize it struct = { 0 }, we get warnings on some
> > compilers.
>
> Which co
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Antognolli
wrote:
> gen4 have commands which start with KernelStartPointer, which is a
> struct, so if we initialize it struct = { 0 }, we get warnings on some
> compilers.
Which compilers?
>
> This macro works around that and will silent such warnings.
gen4 have commands which start with KernelStartPointer, which is a
struct, so if we initialize it struct = { 0 }, we get warnings on some
compilers.
This macro works around that and will silent such warnings.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen
