On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Kristian Høgsberg Kristensen
>> wrote:
>>> When we assign hw regs to attributes, we don't incorporate the stride
>>> and subreg_offset from the fs_reg.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Kristian Høgsberg Kristensen
> wrote:
>> When we assign hw regs to attributes, we don't incorporate the stride
>> and subreg_offset from the fs_reg. It's rarely used, but the integer
>> multiplication loweri
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Kristian Høgsberg Kristensen
wrote:
> When we assign hw regs to attributes, we don't incorporate the stride
> and subreg_offset from the fs_reg. It's rarely used, but the integer
> multiplication lowering uses unusual stride and subreg_offset
> combination breaks w
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Kristian Høgsberg Kristensen
wrote:
> When we assign hw regs to attributes, we don't incorporate the stride
> and subreg_offset from the fs_reg. It's rarely used, but the integer
> multiplication lowering uses unusual stride and subreg_offset
> combination breaks w
When we assign hw regs to attributes, we don't incorporate the stride
and subreg_offset from the fs_reg. It's rarely used, but the integer
multiplication lowering uses unusual stride and subreg_offset
combination breaks when one source is an attribute.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_b
