On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 7:19:24 PM PDT Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:02:58 AM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> >> Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
> >> the field.
> >>
> >> Signed-off
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:02:58 AM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
>> Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
>> the field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
>> ---
>>
>> PS: We can merge this with the prev
On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:02:58 AM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
> the field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
> ---
>
> PS: We can merge this with the previous patch too if that's better.
>
> src/intel/compiler/brw_c
Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
the field.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
---
PS: We can merge this with the previous patch too if that's better.
src/intel/compiler/brw_compiler.h | 2 +-
src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 inse
