On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:13:21 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 01:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:24:08 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
> > wrote:
> >> We don't want to use brw->sampler.count here, as it includes samplers
> >> used only by the FS...which is most of them.
On 02/11/2012 01:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:24:08 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
We don't want to use brw->sampler.count here, as it includes samplers
used only by the FS...which is most of them.
This also lets us drop the CACHE_NEW_SAMPLER dirty bit on Gen6.
My plan fo
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:24:08 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> We don't want to use brw->sampler.count here, as it includes samplers
> used only by the FS...which is most of them.
>
> This also lets us drop the CACHE_NEW_SAMPLER dirty bit on Gen6.
My plan for samplers was that we can just look at
We don't want to use brw->sampler.count here, as it includes samplers
used only by the FS...which is most of them.
This also lets us drop the CACHE_NEW_SAMPLER dirty bit on Gen6.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_vs_state.c |5 ++---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965