Jordan Justen writes:
> An *untested* update for d9cd982d556be560af3bcbcdaf62b6b93eb934a5.
>
> A similar change was needed for CS to allow the piglit test
> tests/spec/arb_compute_shader/execution/simple-barrier-atomics.shader_test
> to pass.
>
> I think the previous change will fix cases that wr
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:03:19AM -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
> An *untested* update for d9cd982d556be560af3bcbcdaf62b6b93eb934a5.
>
> A similar change was needed for CS to allow the piglit test
> tests/spec/arb_compute_shader/execution/simple-barrier-atomics.shader_test
> to pass.
>
> I think t
An *untested* update for d9cd982d556be560af3bcbcdaf62b6b93eb934a5.
A similar change was needed for CS to allow the piglit test
tests/spec/arb_compute_shader/execution/simple-barrier-atomics.shader_test
to pass.
I think the previous change will fix cases that write atomics, such as
atomicCounterIn
On Sunday, February 15, 2015 11:54:55 PM Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to be used
> for PS kill samples/pixels. Since the VS has no such concept, we just need to
> set all 1.
>
> The longer version...
> Execution for SIMD8 atomics is defi
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:24:34AM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 2015 7:46 AM, "Francisco Jerez"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jason Ekstrand writes:
> > >
> > > > On Feb 15, 2015 11:55 PM, "Ben Widawsky" <
> benjamin.widaw...@intel.c
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:24:34AM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2015 7:46 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
> >
> > Jason Ekstrand writes:
> >
> > > On Feb 15, 2015 11:55 PM, "Ben Widawsky"
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to
On Feb 16, 2015 7:46 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
>
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > On Feb 15, 2015 11:55 PM, "Ben Widawsky"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to
be
> > used
> >> for PS kill samples/pixels. Since the VS has no such concept, w
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> On Feb 15, 2015 11:55 PM, "Ben Widawsky"
> wrote:
>>
>> The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to be
> used
>> for PS kill samples/pixels. Since the VS has no such concept, we just
> need to
>> set all 1.
>>
>> The longer version...
>> Execut
On Feb 15, 2015 11:55 PM, "Ben Widawsky"
wrote:
>
> The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to be
used
> for PS kill samples/pixels. Since the VS has no such concept, we just
need to
> set all 1.
>
> The longer version...
> Execution for SIMD8 atomics is defined as foll
Ben Widawsky writes:
> The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to be used
> for PS kill samples/pixels. Since the VS has no such concept, we just need to
> set all 1.
>
> The longer version...
> Execution for SIMD8 atomics is defined as follows:
> SIMD8: The low 8 bits
The short version: we need to set bits in R0.7 which provide a mask to be used
for PS kill samples/pixels. Since the VS has no such concept, we just need to
set all 1.
The longer version...
Execution for SIMD8 atomics is defined as follows:
SIMD8: The low 8 bits of the execution mask are ANDed wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
